PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
-34.16%2.29%74.04%430.61%-96.07%10.43%
3XLE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP
111.19%-11.52%-14.11%-25.61%161.05%-2.17%
Different Trading Currencies

QQQ5.L is traded in USD, while 3XLE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3XLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ5.L achieves a -34.16% return, which is significantly lower than 3XLE.L's 111.19% return.


QQQ5.L

1D
16.54%
1M
-19.91%
YTD
-34.16%
6M
-34.99%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
43.29%
5Y*
10Y*

3XLE.L

1D
-16.44%
1M
9.72%
YTD
111.19%
6M
106.86%
1Y
47.70%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQ5.L and 3XLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ5.L
QQQ5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

3XLE.L
3XLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQ5.L3XLE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

0.67

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.23

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

1.12

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

2.50

-1.08

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the 3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ5.L and 3XLE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQ5.L3XLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.67

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.38

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ5.L and 3XLE.L is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQ5.L nor 3XLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ5.L drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than 3XLE.L's maximum drawdown of -73.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ5.L and 3XLE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ5.L3XLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.40%

-74.89%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.84%

-51.60%

-5.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.53%

-26.34%

-50.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.44%

-45.50%

-30.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.16%

19.49%

+0.67%

Volatility

QQQ5.L vs. 3XLE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) has a higher volatility of 29.49% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) at 27.25%. This indicates that QQQ5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQ5.L3XLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.49%

27.25%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.92%

46.00%

+13.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.75%

70.39%

+27.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.35%

82.92%

+23.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.35%

82.92%

+23.43%