PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
-34.16%2.29%74.04%430.61%-96.07%17.02%
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
37.97%599.32%-31.75%155.76%-78.89%27.15%
Different Trading Currencies

QQQ5.L is traded in USD, while 2MU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ5.L achieves a -34.16% return, which is significantly lower than 2MU.L's 37.97% return.


QQQ5.L

1D
16.54%
1M
-19.91%
YTD
-34.16%
6M
-34.99%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
43.29%
5Y*
10Y*

2MU.L

1D
29.05%
1M
-23.06%
YTD
37.97%
6M
229.83%
1Y
923.41%
3Y*
126.74%
5Y*
27.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQ5.L and 2MU.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ5.L
QQQ5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQ5.L2MU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

7.51

-7.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

4.06

-2.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.52

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

17.38

-16.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

61.35

-59.93

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ5.L and 2MU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQ5.L2MU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

7.51

-7.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.47

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ5.L and 2MU.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQ5.L nor 2MU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ5.L drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than 2MU.L's maximum drawdown of -89.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ5.L and 2MU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ5.L2MU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.40%

-89.16%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.84%

-53.20%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.53%

-40.00%

-36.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.44%

-45.84%

-30.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.16%

14.83%

+5.33%

Volatility

QQQ5.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) is 29.49%, while Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a volatility of 47.16%. This indicates that QQQ5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2MU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQ5.L2MU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.49%

47.16%

-17.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.92%

92.04%

-32.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.75%

121.90%

-24.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.35%

101.24%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.35%

98.62%

+7.73%