PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 56.06% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR.L's 3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ3.L has outperformed SLVR.L with an annualized return of 43.93%, while SLVR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.


QQQ3.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
19.87%
YTD
56.06%
6M
50.04%
1Y
119.69%
3Y*
64.10%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
43.93%

SLVR.L

1D
0.43%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
3.62%
6M
25.14%
1Y
101.84%
3Y*
43.40%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
56.06%27.64%59.91%209.50%-79.58%87.37%110.13%128.92%-21.29%114.27%
SLVR.L
WisdomTree Silver
3.62%136.72%20.15%-2.57%2.25%-14.66%40.61%13.97%-10.13%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ3.L and SLVR.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2012

0.15

The correlation between QQQ3.L and SLVR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVR.L
SLVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQ3.LSLVR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.67

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

5.81

+4.97

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ3.L and SLVR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQ3.LSLVR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.85

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.52

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.42

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.22

+0.60

Drawdowns

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVR.L drawdown of -79.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and SLVR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ3.LSLVR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.35%

-79.93%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.92%

-40.74%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.20%

-40.74%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.35%

-40.74%

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

-46.90%

-34.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-35.42%

+32.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-49.43%

+29.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.49%

18.74%

-7.25%

Volatility

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) is 14.73%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that QQQ3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQ3.LSLVR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.73%

17.68%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.78%

56.07%

-21.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.01%

58.81%

-11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.24%

36.80%

+25.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.91%

31.95%

+27.96%

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVR.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ3.L vs. SLVR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQ3.L nor SLVR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ3.L and SLVR.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLVR.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLVR.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

QQQ3.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SLVR.L is Silver. QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.49% for SLVR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ3.L and SLVR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer