QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L
QQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) and EQSG.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQ3.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while EQSG.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQ3.L returned 26.81%/yr vs 17.83%/yr for EQSG.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQ3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EQSG.L.
Performance
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQ3.L is traded in USD, while EQSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQSG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 56.06% return, which is significantly higher than EQSG.L's 19.62% return.
QQQ3.L
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 19.87%
- YTD
- 56.06%
- 6M
- 50.04%
- 1Y
- 119.69%
- 3Y*
- 64.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.93%
EQSG.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 19.62%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.83%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | 56.06% | 27.64% | 59.91% | 209.50% | -79.58% | 99.62% |
EQSG.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.62% | 20.16% | 26.61% | 55.95% | -33.69% | 29.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ3.L and EQSG.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between QQQ3.L and EQSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ3.L
EQSG.L
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ3.L | EQSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.29 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 2.19 | +8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ3.L | EQSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.90 | +1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.53 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, which is greater than EQSG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and EQSG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ3.L | EQSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.35% | -35.09% | -46.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.92% | -31.29% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.20% | -34.79% | -23.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.35% | -35.09% | -46.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -9.80% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.62% | -15.50% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.49% | 18.45% | -6.96% |
Volatility
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) at 4.38%. This indicates that QQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ3.L | EQSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 4.38% | +10.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.78% | 11.17% | +23.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.01% | 44.59% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.24% | 36.02% | +26.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.91% | 35.55% | +24.36% |
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQSG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ3.L vs. EQSG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QQQ3.L nor EQSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QQQ3.L and EQSG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EQSG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQSG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.
QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while EQSG.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.20% for EQSG.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQ3.L and EQSG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer