PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 56.06% return, which is significantly higher than EQQS.L's 19.72% return.


QQQ3.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
19.87%
YTD
56.06%
6M
50.04%
1Y
119.69%
3Y*
64.10%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
43.93%

EQQS.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
6.80%
YTD
19.72%
6M
18.69%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
18.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
56.06%27.64%59.91%209.50%-79.58%56.22%
EQQS.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
19.72%19.85%26.77%55.63%-33.47%19.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ3.L and EQQS.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.89

The correlation between QQQ3.L and EQQS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQS.L
EQQS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQ3.LEQQS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.60

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

13.17

-2.39

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ3.L and EQQS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQ3.LEQQS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.90

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.87

-0.05

Drawdowns

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, which is greater than EQQS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and EQQS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ3.LEQQS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.35%

-34.93%

-46.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.92%

-11.17%

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.20%

-22.39%

-35.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.35%

-34.93%

-46.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-0.77%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-9.00%

-10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.49%

3.06%

+8.43%

Volatility

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) at 4.79%. This indicates that QQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQ3.LEQQS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.73%

4.79%

+9.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.78%

11.68%

+23.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.01%

15.68%

+31.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.24%

22.37%

+39.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.91%

22.49%

+37.42%

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ3.L vs. EQQS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQ3.L nor EQQS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QQQ3.L and EQQS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EQQS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while EQQS.L tracks NASDAQ - 100 Notional NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.20% for EQQS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ3.L and EQQS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer