QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQ3.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while ANXG.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ3.L returned 43.93%/yr vs 21.72%/yr for ANXG.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQ3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.

Performance

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQQ3.L is traded in USD, while ANXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 56.06% return, which is significantly higher than ANXG.L's 19.59% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ3.L has outperformed ANXG.L with an annualized return of 43.93%, while ANXG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 21.72% annualized return.

QQQ3.L

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: 25.62%
• YTD: 56.06%
• 6M: 51.95%
• 1Y: 124.35%
• 3Y*: 64.10%
• 5Y*: 26.81%
• 10Y*: 43.93%

ANXG.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 8.72%
• YTD: 19.59%
• 6M: 19.35%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: 28.06%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: 21.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged	56.06%	27.64%	59.91%	209.50%	-79.58%	87.37%	110.13%	128.92%	-21.29%	114.27%
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD	19.59%	20.12%	26.56%	55.81%	-33.39%	28.67%	47.76%	40.10%	-1.80%	31.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ3.L and ANXG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.94

The correlation between QQQ3.L and ANXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ3.L

QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ANXG.L

ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQ3.L	ANXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.66	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.60	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.66	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.78	13.38	-2.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ3.L and ANXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQ3.L	ANXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.66	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.87	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	1.10	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	1.12	-0.30

Drawdowns

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, which is greater than ANXG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and ANXG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQ3.L	ANXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.35%	-35.18%	-46.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.92%	-11.02%	-24.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.20%	-23.10%	-35.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.35%	-35.18%	-46.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.35%	-35.18%	-46.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-0.78%	-1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.62%	-6.07%	-13.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.49%	3.02%	+8.47%

Volatility

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) at 4.31%. This indicates that QQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQ3.L	ANXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.73%	4.31%	+10.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.78%	11.21%	+23.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.01%	15.15%	+31.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.24%	20.44%	+41.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.91%	19.82%	+40.09%

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQ3.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQ3.L nor ANXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQ3.L and ANXG.L in my portfolio?

QQQ3.L and ANXG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQ3.L or ANXG.L?

On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQ3.L or ANXG.L?

ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

What is the main difference between QQQ3.L and ANXG.L?

QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.13% for ANXG.L.