QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
QQI.TO (BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQI.TO is passively managed, while JEPQ.TO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions. QQI.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQI.TO achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.TO's 14.67% return.
QQI.TO
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 6M
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 31.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | -16.04% | -3.15% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 14.67% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQI.TO and JEPQ.TO is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2025 | -0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQI.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JEPQ.TO
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQI.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQI.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQI.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQI.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -20.05% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.72% | -0.86% | -23.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -3.31% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQI.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 14.25% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.71% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.71% | +2.55% |
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQI.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQI.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 9.68% | 10.34% | 1.72% |
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQI.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for QQI.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for QQI.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQI.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer