QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

QQI.TO (BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF) and CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while CBIL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. QQI.TO is passively managed, while CBIL.TO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. QQI.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBIL.TO.

Performance

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQI.TO achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly lower than CBIL.TO's 1.03% return.

QQI.TO

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: -16.04%
• 6M: -16.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBIL.TO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 2.33%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF	-16.04%	-3.15%
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.03%	0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QQI.TO and CBIL.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQI.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBIL.TO

CBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQI.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	9.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	21.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	5.73	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	58.57	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	327.93	—

Drawdowns

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQI.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQI.TO and CBIL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQI.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.23%	-0.06%	-25.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.72%	0.00%	-24.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-0.00%	-8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQI.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	0.25%	+20.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.26%	0.32%	+19.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.26%	0.32%	+19.94%

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQI.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQI.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	2.25%	2.58%	4.38%	3.39%
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQI.TO and CBIL.TO in my portfolio?

QQI.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQI.TO or CBIL.TO?

On fees, CBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQI.TO or CBIL.TO?

CBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for QQI.TO.

What is the main difference between QQI.TO and CBIL.TO?

QQI.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CBIL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for QQI.TO and 0.10% for CBIL.TO.