QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Invesco and BMO respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQCI.TO returned 34.93% vs 42.93% for ZNQ.TO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 22.76% return.

QQCI.TO

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 16.01%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 34.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZNQ.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 13.05%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 42.93%
• 3Y*: 29.76%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	16.01%	12.64%	11.70%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	22.76%	14.60%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	0.80

The correlation between QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQCI.TO	ZNQ.TO
Technology	53.8%	54.1%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.6%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.8%	3.1%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.2%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ZNQ.TO

ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQCI.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.75	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.58	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.48	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.61	3.45	+1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.33	10.86	+5.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQCI.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.75	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	1.06	+0.46

Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCI.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-32.09%	+13.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-12.50%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-6.63%	+3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	3.96%	-1.82%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 3.32%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCI.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	4.49%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	11.99%	-2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	15.69%	-2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	20.81%	-5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.55%	22.34%	-6.79%

Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	8.60%	9.34%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	0.20%	0.25%	0.30%	0.35%	0.23%	0.12%	0.47%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO in my portfolio?

QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between QQCI.TO and ZNQ.TO?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO.