QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI, while TXF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQCI.TO returned 24.09% vs 36.48% for TXF.TO. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQCI.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for TXF.TO.

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than TXF.TO's 14.26% return.

QQCI.TO

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -4.23%
• 6M: 12.17%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 24.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.32%

TXF.TO

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -7.56%
• 6M: 12.75%
• YTD: 14.26%
• 1Y: 36.48%
• 3Y*: 23.28%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: 17.47%
• ALL TIME*: 15.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	CA$141.03K	CA$115.67K	CA$152.23K
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common	CA$1.03M	CA$1.20M	CA$865.03K

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	11.99%	12.64%	11.81%
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common	14.26%	24.80%	2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and TXF.TO is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024	0.72

The correlation between QQCI.TO and TXF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQCI.TO	TXF.TO
Technology	60.9%	92.1%
Communication Services	13.1%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	-
Industrials	2.7%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	0.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

TXF.TO

TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQCI.TO	TXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.31	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	1.76	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	1.87	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	6.35	+2.22

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and TXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum TXF.TO drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and TXF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCI.TO	TXF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-41.23%	+22.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-18.27%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-13.27%	+7.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-6.19%	+3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	5.36%	-2.80%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 4.91%, while CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCI.TO	TXF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	10.43%	-5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	22.79%	-11.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	25.98%	-11.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	25.68%	-9.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	24.05%	-8.13%

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCI.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than TXF.TO's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, less than TXF.TO's 11.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	9.32%	9.34%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common	11.84%	10.59%	9.75%	7.48%	14.13%	7.77%	11.01%	7.29%	9.29%	4.89%	6.16%	6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCI.TO and TXF.TO in my portfolio?

QQCI.TO and TXF.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCI.TO or TXF.TO?

On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCI.TO or TXF.TO?

QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for TXF.TO.

What is the main difference between QQCI.TO and TXF.TO?

QQCI.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TXF.TO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCI.TO and 0.71% for TXF.TO.