QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO
QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and TQQQ.TO (BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQCI.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while TQQQ.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ.TO's 61.21% return.
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 16.01%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 34.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 32.95%
- YTD
- 61.21%
- 6M
- 52.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 16.01% | 16.37% |
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF | 61.21% | 41.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCI.TO and TQQQ.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQCI.TO
TQQQ.TO
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQCI.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQCI.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 2.86 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ.TO drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and TQQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCI.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -38.15% | +19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -8.46% | +5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQCI.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 47.75% | -34.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 47.75% | -32.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 47.75% | -32.20% |
Dividends
QQCI.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, while TQQQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.60% | 9.34% | 3.17% |
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQCI.TO and TQQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQCI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while TQQQ.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X.
Find the right allocation for QQCI.TO and TQQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer