PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO).

QQCI.TO and TLV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQCI.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2025. TLV.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. Both QQCI.TO and TLV.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF		-2.67%12.64%11.70%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF		3.87%22.51%6.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than TLV.TO's 3.87% return.

QQCI.TO

1D
2.68%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
0.24%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

TLV.TO

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
3.87%
6M
9.54%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF

Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF

Often compared with QQCI.TO:
QQCI.TO vs. ESG.TOQQCI.TO vs. XIU.TOQQCI.TO vs. HXQ.TOQQCI.TO vs. JEPQQQCI.TO vs. QQCE.TOQQCI.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCI.TO vs. QQQI
Often compared with TLV.TO:
TLV.TO vs. ESG.TOTLV.TO vs. CLSA.TOTLV.TO vs. XIC.TOTLV.TO vs. VCE.TOTLV.TO vs. XCS.TOTLV.TO vs. XDV.TOTLV.TO vs. CANY.TO

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF

Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
TLV.TO
TLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QQCI.TOTLV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

2.61

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

3.46

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.56

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.62

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

19.44

-13.53

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and TLV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QQCI.TOTLV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.61

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.01

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.67

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.13

+0.98

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and TLV.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, more than TLV.TO's 3.16% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF		9.81%9.34%3.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF		3.16%3.25%3.40%4.12%4.01%2.49%2.75%3.74%4.28%3.58%3.46%4.08%

Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum TLV.TO drawdown of -81.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and TLV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

QQCI.TOTLV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-81.40%

+62.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-6.57%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-19.36%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.68%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.14%

-36.54%

+31.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-64.71%

+61.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.22%

+1.73%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. TLV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) at 3.26%. This indicates that QQCI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

QQCI.TOTLV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

3.26%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

5.72%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

9.05%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

9.89%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

12.67%

+3.10%