QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO
QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and QQI.TO (BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQCI.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while QQI.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly higher than QQI.TO's -16.51% return.
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 16.01%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 34.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQI.TO
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- -16.51%
- 6M
- -16.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 16.01% | 3.31% |
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | -16.51% | -3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCI.TO and QQI.TO is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | -0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQCI.TO
QQI.TO
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQCI.TO | QQI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQCI.TO | QQI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | -1.43 | +2.95 |
Drawdowns
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum QQI.TO drawdown of -25.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and QQI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCI.TO | QQI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -25.19% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -25.14% | +25.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -6.88% | +3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQCI.TO | QQI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 18.46% | -5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 18.46% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 18.46% | -2.91% |
Dividends
QQCI.TO vs. QQI.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, while QQI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.60% | 9.34% | 3.17% |
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQCI.TO and QQI.TO have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQCI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QQI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X.
Find the right allocation for QQCI.TO and QQI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer