PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Invesco Morningstar Global Next Gen AI Index ETF (INAI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
-2.67%12.64%11.70%
INAI.TO
Invesco Morningstar Global Next Gen AI Index ETF
-9.34%30.39%18.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than INAI.TO's -9.34% return.


QQCI.TO

1D
2.68%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
0.24%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INAI.TO

1D
1.87%
1M
-7.50%
YTD
-9.34%
6M
-9.72%
1Y
33.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

INAI.TO
INAI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
INAI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INAI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
INAI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
INAI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
INAI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Invesco Morningstar Global Next Gen AI Index ETF (INAI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQCI.TOINAI.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

1.65

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.32

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

3.80

+2.12

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the INAI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and INAI.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQCI.TOINAI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.11

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and INAI.TO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, more than INAI.TO's 0.05% yield.


Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum INAI.TO drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and INAI.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQCI.TOINAI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-26.78%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-22.07%

+11.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.14%

-20.61%

+15.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-5.23%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

7.65%

-4.70%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. INAI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 4.86%, while Invesco Morningstar Global Next Gen AI Index ETF (INAI.TO) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INAI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQCI.TOINAI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

8.38%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

19.12%

-8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

28.26%

-11.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

27.03%

-11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

27.03%

-11.26%