QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQCE.TO (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCE.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 ESG Index, while ZSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQCE.TO returned 30.82%/yr vs 23.44%/yr for ZSP.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQCE.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZSP.TO.

Performance

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCE.TO achieves a 23.30% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's 12.15% return.

QQCE.TO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 14.10%
• YTD: 23.30%
• 6M: 19.99%
• 1Y: 45.87%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZSP.TO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 7.18%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 28.96%
• 3Y*: 23.44%
• 5Y*: 16.74%
• 10Y*: 15.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	23.30%	16.43%	36.67%	44.13%	-25.37%	5.14%
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF	12.15%	12.02%	35.07%	23.30%	-12.68%	5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021	0.58

Over the past year, QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCE.TO

QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ZSP.TO

ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQCE.TO	ZSP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.53	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.45	+0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.47	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	3.38	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.72	12.70	-1.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQCE.TO	ZSP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.53	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.15	-0.23

Drawdowns

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCE.TO	ZSP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.86%	-26.94%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-8.61%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.05%	-18.95%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.29%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.70%	-3.34%	-5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	2.29%	+2.00%

Volatility

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) at 3.14%. This indicates that QQCE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCE.TO	ZSP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	3.14%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.65%	8.65%	+4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.47%	11.53%	+4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.71%	14.97%	+5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	16.36%	+4.35%

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCE.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQCE.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than ZSP.TO's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.26%	0.32%	0.38%	0.44%	0.79%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF	0.75%	0.82%	0.94%	1.33%	1.44%	1.15%	1.44%	1.47%	1.63%	1.63%	2.20%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO in my portfolio?

QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCE.TO or ZSP.TO?

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCE.TO or ZSP.TO?

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for QQCE.TO.

What is the main difference between QQCE.TO and ZSP.TO?

QQCE.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. QQCE.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 ESG Index, while ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCE.TO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.