QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Invesco and BMO respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQC.TO returned 21.56%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for ZNQ.TO. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZNQ.TO.

Performance

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQC.TO having a 22.65% return and ZNQ.TO slightly higher at 22.76%.

QQC.TO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 12.93%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 6M: 19.07%
• 1Y: 43.34%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 21.56%
• 10Y*: —

ZNQ.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 13.05%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 42.93%
• 3Y*: 29.76%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	22.65%	15.38%	35.73%	51.73%	-28.07%	25.01%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	22.76%	14.60%	35.84%	51.32%	-28.06%	24.79%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021	0.95

The correlation between QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQC.TO	ZNQ.TO
Technology	53.8%	54.1%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.6%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.8%	3.1%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.2%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

ZNQ.TO

ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQC.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.75	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	3.58	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.48	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	3.45	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	10.86	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQC.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.75	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.01	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	1.06	-0.04

Drawdowns

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, roughly equal to the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.81%	-32.09%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	-12.50%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-22.67%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.81%	-32.09%	+0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-6.63%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.96%	-0.14%

Volatility

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC.TO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	4.49%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	11.99%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	15.69%	-0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.85%	20.81%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	22.34%	-1.52%

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQC.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.31%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	0.20%	0.25%	0.30%	0.35%	0.23%	0.12%	0.47%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QQC.TO or ZNQ.TO?

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC.TO or ZNQ.TO?

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.

What is the main difference between QQC.TO and ZNQ.TO?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.