PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQC.TO having a 22.48% return and XEI.TO slightly lower at 22.21%.


QQC.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
12.65%
YTD
22.48%
6M
18.98%
1Y
44.29%
3Y*
29.93%
5Y*
21.52%
10Y*

XEI.TO

1D
1.35%
1M
3.16%
YTD
22.21%
6M
23.91%
1Y
44.20%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
22.48%15.38%35.73%51.73%-28.07%25.01%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
22.21%25.96%15.42%6.69%0.41%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC.TO and XEI.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between QQC.TO and XEI.TO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQC.TO
XEI.TO

Technology

53.8%
0.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
0.5%

Healthcare

4.2%
0.2%

Industrials

2.8%
0.7%

Utilities

1.4%
11.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.6%

Energy

0.6%
32.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
31.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
4.8%

Technology

QQC.TO
53.8%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Communication Services

QQC.TO
15.8%
XEI.TO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QQC.TO
12.3%
XEI.TO
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

QQC.TO
7.7%
XEI.TO
0.5%

Healthcare

QQC.TO
4.2%
XEI.TO
0.2%

Industrials

QQC.TO
2.8%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Utilities

QQC.TO
1.4%
XEI.TO
11.2%

Basic Materials

QQC.TO
1.1%
XEI.TO
4.6%

Energy

QQC.TO
0.6%
XEI.TO
32.1%

Financial Services

QQC.TO
0.2%
XEI.TO
31.4%

Real Estate

QQC.TO
0.1%
XEI.TO
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC.TO
QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XEI.TO
XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQC.TOXEI.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

6.16

-3.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

9.17

-5.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.29

-0.78

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

20.05

-16.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.87

68.19

-56.32

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is lower than the XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC.TO and XEI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQC.TOXEI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

6.16

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.40

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.67

+0.36

Drawdowns

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, smaller than the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and XEI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC.TOXEI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.81%

-45.51%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-2.24%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-9.92%

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.81%

-17.32%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-5.05%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

0.66%

+3.16%

Volatility

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) at 2.88%. This indicates that QQC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC.TOXEI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

2.88%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

6.01%

+5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

7.22%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

11.24%

+9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

16.01%

+4.82%

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQC.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than XEI.TO's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.32%0.39%0.45%0.54%0.91%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
3.56%4.39%5.56%5.08%4.78%3.65%5.13%4.71%5.53%4.37%4.51%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XEI.TO.

QQC.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC.TO and XEI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer