QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and CMR.TO (iShares Premium Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CMR.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by iShares. QQC.TO is passively managed, while CMR.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQC.TO returned 21.52%/yr vs 2.94%/yr for CMR.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for CMR.TO.

Performance

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC.TO achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than CMR.TO's 0.97% return.

QQC.TO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 12.65%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 44.29%
• 3Y*: 29.93%
• 5Y*: 21.52%
• 10Y*: —

CMR.TO

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 2.39%
• 3Y*: 3.73%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 1.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	22.48%	15.38%	35.73%	51.73%	-28.07%	25.01%
CMR.TO iShares Premium Money Market ETF	0.97%	2.68%	4.70%	4.70%	1.71%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC.TO and CMR.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021	0.04

Return for Risk

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CMR.TO

CMR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CMR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CMR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CMR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CMR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CMR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQC.TO	CMR.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	10.70	-7.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	21.31	-17.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	9.64	-8.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	25.77	-22.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	191.12	-179.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is lower than the CMR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 10.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC.TO and CMR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQC.TO	CMR.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	10.70	-7.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	10.69	-9.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	7.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	3.84	-2.82

Drawdowns

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, which is greater than CMR.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and CMR.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC.TO	CMR.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.81%	-0.52%	-31.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	-0.09%	-12.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-0.09%	-22.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.81%	-0.09%	-31.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-0.01%	-8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	0.01%	+3.81%

Volatility

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that QQC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC.TO	CMR.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	0.06%	+4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	0.18%	+11.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.34%	0.22%	+15.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.85%	0.28%	+20.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.83%	0.27%	+20.56%

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CMR.TO's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQC.TO vs. CMR.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than CMR.TO's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMR.TO iShares Premium Money Market ETF	2.48%	2.81%	4.56%	4.64%	1.62%	0.00%	0.47%	1.60%	1.33%	0.61%	0.43%	0.48%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.32%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC.TO and CMR.TO in my portfolio?

QQC.TO and CMR.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQC.TO or CMR.TO?

On fees, CMR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC.TO or CMR.TO?

CMR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC.TO.

What is the main difference between QQC.TO and CMR.TO?

QQC.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CMR.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.14% for CMR.TO.