PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNZNX vs. ABYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNZNX achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than ABYIX's 7.88% return.


QNZNX

1D
0.69%
1M
4.12%
YTD
18.15%
6M
20.39%
1Y
38.15%
3Y*
32.33%
5Y*
10Y*

ABYIX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.93%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.03%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
18.15%22.88%34.96%22.73%1.37%
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
7.88%1.62%1.11%-3.29%8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QNZNX and ABYIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.31

Over the past year, QNZNX and ABYIX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QNZNX vs. ABYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNZNX
QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ABYIX
ABYIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ABYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ABYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNZNXABYIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.62

2.08

+1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.72

2.89

+1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.38

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.97

5.61

+2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

32.08

15.20

+16.88

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNZNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the ABYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNZNX and ABYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNZNXABYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62

2.08

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

0.56

+1.41

Drawdowns

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNZNX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than ABYIX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNZNX and ABYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QNZNXABYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-17.13%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-2.85%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-14.00%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-6.66%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.05%

+0.16%

Volatility

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) at 2.10%. This indicates that QNZNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QNZNXABYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.10%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

5.91%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

7.69%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

7.99%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.05%

8.02%

+4.03%

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNZNX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than ABYIX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

QNZNX vs. ABYIX - Dividend Comparison

QNZNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than ABYIX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
1.23%1.33%2.10%2.03%15.24%3.68%1.54%8.70%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.24%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
0.73%0.86%16.46%23.14%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QNZNX and ABYIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNZNX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to ABYIX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QNZNX dropped -18.38% vs ABYIX's -17.13%.

QNZNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QNZNX and ABYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer