QNTG.L vs. MOAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).

QNTG.L and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNTG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Quantum Leaders Index. It was launched on May 21, 2025. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. Both QNTG.L and MOAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QNTG.L vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QNTG.L vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	-6.88%	18.84%
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-5.33%	16.84%

Different Trading Currencies

QNTG.L is traded in GBp, while MOAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -5.33% return.

QNTG.L

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: -6.13%
• YTD: -6.88%
• 6M: -7.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOAT

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -8.37%
• YTD: -5.33%
• 6M: -1.06%
• 1Y: 8.73%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: 8.84%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNTG.L vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.

QNTG.L

VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc

MOAT

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Return for Risk

QNTG.L vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 31
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNTG.L vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QNTG.L	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.84	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between QNTG.L and MOAT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QNTG.L vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

QNTG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.46%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Drawdowns

QNTG.L vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNTG.L	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.25%	-33.31%	+10.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.84%	-10.42%	-9.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-3.80%	-4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNTG.L	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.42%	20.01%	+7.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.42%	16.74%	+10.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.42%	18.50%	+8.92%