PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMNIX vs. HAO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMNIX vs. HAO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) and Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNIX achieves a -8.25% return, which is significantly higher than HAO's -99.81% return.


QMNIX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-6.45%
YTD
-8.25%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
18.16%
10Y*
6.04%

HAO

1D
-25.84%
1M
-72.00%
6M
-99.87%
YTD
-99.81%
1Y
-99.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMNIX vs. HAO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QMNIX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
-8.25%26.54%18.55%
HAO
Haoxi Health Technology Limited
-99.81%-71.47%-96.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNIX and HAO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMNIX vs. HAO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMNIX
QMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HAO
HAO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HAO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HAO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMNIX vs. HAO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) and Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMNIXHAODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.55

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

-1.00

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

-2.10

+2.85

QMNIX vs. HAO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the HAO Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNIX and HAO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMNIX vs. HAO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNIX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum HAO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNIX and HAO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMNIXHAODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-100.00%

+61.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-99.87%

+90.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-100.00%

+91.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-81.87%

+71.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

47.41%

-43.11%

Volatility

QMNIX vs. HAO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) is 2.37%, while Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO) has a volatility of 113.60%. This indicates that QMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMNIXHAODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

113.60%

-111.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.47%

311.07%

-305.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

154.53%

-147.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.27%

164.54%

-155.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

164.54%

-156.23%

Dividends

QMNIX vs. HAO - Dividend Comparison

QMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while HAO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAO
Haoxi Health Technology Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QMNIX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
1.53%1.41%6.10%21.48%5.95%1.39%17.42%3.83%0.48%3.48%1.51%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMNIX and HAO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAO has higher volatility (113.60%) compared to QMNIX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNIX dropped -38.80% vs HAO's -100.00%.

QMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMNIX and HAO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer