QMLFX vs. GOIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX).
QMLFX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013. GOIIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund | -3.62% | 0.97% | 11.05% | 15.04% | -23.59% | 13.22% | 37.81% | 26.08% | -13.48% | 16.76% |
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio | -3.39% | 15.03% | 14.81% | 15.16% | -15.86% | 12.65% | 12.73% | 19.16% | -8.63% | 16.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMLFX achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than GOIIX's -3.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QMLFX having a 8.09% annualized return and GOIIX not far behind at 7.70%.
QMLFX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -9.61%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
GOIIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 12.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMLFX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QMLFX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank
QMLFX
GOIIX
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMLFX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 1.21 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 1.61 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.98 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 4.37 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMLFX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.21 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.60 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.69 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.52 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between QMLFX and GOIIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison
QMLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than GOIIX's 8.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund | 1.42% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 26.84% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 15.63% | 12.15% | 2.22% | 1.63% |
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio | 8.88% | 7.98% | 9.79% | 1.97% | 5.09% | 6.80% | 3.47% | 2.29% | 3.04% | 2.73% | 1.37% | 3.99% |
Drawdowns
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMLFX drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, smaller than the maximum GOIIX drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMLFX and GOIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMLFX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.59% | -43.63% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.52% | -8.55% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.59% | -23.78% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.59% | -25.07% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.15% | -7.10% | -10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -6.44% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 2.14% | +2.45% |
Volatility
QMLFX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) at 3.77%. This indicates that QMLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QMLFX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 3.77% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 6.48% | +9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.96% | 10.40% | +10.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 10.58% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 11.22% | +9.65% |