PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMID vs. TEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMID vs. TEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than TEKX's 79.26% return.


QMID

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.24%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEKX

1D
-2.14%
1M
11.93%
YTD
79.26%
6M
72.14%
1Y
156.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMID vs. TEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QMID and TEKX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.63

The correlation between QMID and TEKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMID vs. TEKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMID
TEKX

Industrials

25.0%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
1.5%

Technology

15.8%
54.1%

Healthcare

14.1%

-

Financial Services

12.0%
24.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
1.3%

Energy

3.2%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

5.3%

Industrials

QMID
25.0%
TEKX
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QMID
15.9%
TEKX
1.5%

Technology

QMID
15.8%
TEKX
54.1%

Healthcare

QMID
14.1%
TEKX

-

Financial Services

QMID
12.0%
TEKX
24.5%

Consumer Defensive

QMID
7.5%
TEKX
1.3%

Energy

QMID
3.2%
TEKX
1.4%

Communication Services

QMID
3.2%
TEKX
1.7%

Basic Materials

QMID
2.2%
TEKX
3.6%

Real Estate

QMID

-

TEKX

-

Utilities

QMID

-

TEKX
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMID vs. TEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMID
QMID Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TEKX
TEKX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMID vs. TEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMIDTEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.55

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

8.76

-7.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.85

28.47

-25.62

QMID vs. TEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the TEKX Sharpe Ratio of 4.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and TEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMID vs. TEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum TEKX drawdown of -45.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and TEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMIDTEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-45.57%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-17.92%

+7.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-2.14%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-10.09%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

5.50%

-2.34%

Volatility

QMID vs. TEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is 3.95%, while SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) has a volatility of 11.88%. This indicates that QMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMIDTEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

11.88%

-7.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

30.10%

-19.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

38.29%

-23.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

44.46%

-26.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

44.46%

-26.03%

QMID vs. TEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TEKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMID vs. TEKX - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than TEKX's 0.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QMID and TEKX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEKX has higher volatility (11.88%) compared to QMID (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs TEKX's -45.57%.

On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 156.00% vs 9.00% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QMID has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 156.00% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TEKX.

QMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.20% for TEKX.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street Global Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.65% for TEKX.

TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMID and TEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer