PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMID vs. SFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMID vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QMID

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.74%
YTD
2.79%
6M
2.15%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFYX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMID vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
2.79%5.02%9.33%
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
5.66%14.25%15.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and SFYX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.84

The correlation between QMID and SFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QMID vs. SFYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMID
SFYX

Industrials

23.6%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.2%
9.9%

Technology

16.3%
16.9%

Healthcare

14.5%
12.1%

Financial Services

12.5%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
3.0%

Energy

3.3%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.1%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

6.4%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Industrials

QMID
23.6%
SFYX
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QMID
18.2%
SFYX
9.9%

Technology

QMID
16.3%
SFYX
16.9%

Healthcare

QMID
14.5%
SFYX
12.1%

Financial Services

QMID
12.5%
SFYX
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

QMID
6.4%
SFYX
3.0%

Energy

QMID
3.3%
SFYX
4.5%

Communication Services

QMID
3.1%
SFYX
4.5%

Basic Materials

QMID
2.1%
SFYX
3.2%

Real Estate

QMID

-

SFYX
6.4%

Utilities

QMID

-

SFYX
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMID vs. SFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMID
QMID Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SFYX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMID vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMIDSFYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.13

QMID vs. SFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMIDSFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

QMID vs. SFYX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMIDSFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

Volatility

QMID vs. SFYX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMIDSFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

QMID vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMID vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SFYX's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
0.50%0.51%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
1.36%1.44%1.25%1.51%1.56%0.90%1.16%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMID and SFYX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.50% for QMID.

QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.00% for SFYX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMID and SFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer