QMID vs. SFYX
QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QMID tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index while SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QMID charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFYX.
Performance
QMID vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QMID
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMID vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund | 2.79% | 5.02% | 9.33% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 14.25% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMID and SFYX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QMID and SFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QMID vs. SFYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QMID
SFYX
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
QMID
SFYX
Consumer Cyclical
QMID
SFYX
Technology
QMID
SFYX
Healthcare
QMID
SFYX
Financial Services
QMID
SFYX
Consumer Defensive
QMID
SFYX
Energy
QMID
SFYX
Communication Services
QMID
SFYX
Basic Materials
QMID
SFYX
Real Estate
QMID
-
SFYX
Utilities
QMID
-
SFYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMID vs. SFYX — Risk / Return Rank
QMID
SFYX
QMID vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMID | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMID | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | — | — |
Drawdowns
QMID vs. SFYX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMID | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
QMID vs. SFYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMID | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | — | — |
QMID vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMID vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison
QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SFYX's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund | 0.50% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMID and SFYX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.
SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.50% for QMID.
QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.00% for SFYX.
Find the right allocation for QMID and SFYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer