QMID vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 9.00% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMID charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

QMID vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.

QMID

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: -1.04%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMID vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	1.24%	5.02%	9.01%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and IBID is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.01

The correlation between QMID and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QMID vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMID vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMID	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	3.19	-2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	5.38	-4.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.72	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	7.20	-6.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.85	29.14	-26.28

QMID vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMID vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMID	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-1.28%	-23.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-0.55%	-10.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-0.55%	-2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-0.22%	-5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	0.13%	+3.03%

Volatility

QMID vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMID	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	0.35%	+3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	0.86%	+9.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	1.23%	+13.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	2.24%	+16.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.43%	2.24%	+16.19%

QMID vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMID vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.51%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMID and IBID in my portfolio?

QMID and IBID have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMID or IBID?

QMID has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, QMID or IBID?

On 1-year performance, QMID leads with 9.00% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMID or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, QMID has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMID or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMID or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.51% for QMID.

What is the main difference between QMID and IBID?

QMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.