PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMID vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMID vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


QMID

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.96%
6M
4.68%
YTD
5.39%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.76%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$4.39K$13.06K$31.63K

QMID vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
5.39%5.02%9.01%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-11.71%3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and DBO is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between QMID and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMID vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMID
QMID Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMID vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMIDDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

2.01

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

6.09

-3.32

QMID vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMID vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMIDDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-90.18%

+65.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-27.73%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-53.56%

+52.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-62.20%

+56.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

9.96%

-6.81%

Volatility

QMID vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is 3.78%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that QMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMIDDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

17.75%

-13.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

33.77%

-22.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

38.53%

-23.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

33.35%

-15.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

32.20%

-13.97%

QMID vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMID vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than DBO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
0.49%0.51%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMID and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to QMID (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 60.30% vs 10.41% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QMID has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 60.30% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.49% for QMID.

QMID is categorized as Quality Factor, while DBO is Oil & Gas. QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMID and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer