QMFRX vs. FSLTX
QMFRX (AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6) and FSLTX (Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMFRX charges 3.45%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for FSLTX.
Performance
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMFRX achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than FSLTX's 5.58% return.
QMFRX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSLTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QMFRX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 | 11.42% | 3.55% |
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund | 5.58% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMFRX and FSLTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMFRX vs. FSLTX — Risk / Return Rank
QMFRX
FSLTX
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 (QMFRX) and Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMFRX | FSLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.14 | 1.63 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMFRX drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, which is greater than FSLTX's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMFRX and FSLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMFRX | FSLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -3.78% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | 0.00% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -0.60% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMFRX | FSLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 2.17% | +12.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 4.88% | +9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 4.88% | +9.38% |
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMFRX has a 3.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLTX's 1.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMFRX vs. FSLTX - Dividend Comparison
QMFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FSLTX's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLTX Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund | 5.21% | 5.50% | 7.52% | 3.94% |
QMFRX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMFRX and FSLTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QMFRX and FSLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer