QMFNX vs. QHFNX
QMFNX (AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N) and QHFNX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N) are both Multistrategy funds from AQR. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QMFNX charges 3.80%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for QHFNX.
Performance
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMFNX achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than QHFNX's 0.59% return.
QMFNX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFNX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QMFNX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N | 8.20% | 3.54% |
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N | 0.59% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMFNX and QHFNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N (QMFNX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMFNX drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum QHFNX drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMFNX and QHFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMFNX | QHFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -13.87% | +3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -3.10% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -4.88% | +2.57% |
Volatility
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMFNX | QHFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.99% | 16.89% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 16.89% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 16.89% | -1.90% |
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMFNX has a 3.80% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFNX's 6.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMFNX vs. QHFNX - Dividend Comparison
QMFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while QHFNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMFNX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N | 0.35% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMFNX and QHFNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QMFNX and QHFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer