PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMCO vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QMCO vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantum Corporation (QMCO) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMCO achieves a 94.42% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, QMCO has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of -15.74%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.


QMCO

1D
19.54%
1M
66.76%
YTD
94.42%
6M
62.44%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
-21.17%
5Y*
-38.42%
10Y*
-15.74%

ABBV

1D
1.16%
1M
4.26%
YTD
-4.18%
6M
-2.42%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
18.28%
10Y*
17.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMCO vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMCO
Quantum Corporation
94.42%-88.04%672.49%-67.98%-80.25%-9.80%-17.52%271.00%-64.48%-15.42%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
-4.18%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QMCO and ABBV is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.10

The correlation between QMCO and ABBV shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QMCO:

$171.66M

ABBV:

$382.12B

EPS

QMCO:

-$8.86

ABBV:

$2.05

PS Ratio

QMCO:

0.55

ABBV:

6.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

QMCO:

$261.28M

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QMCO:

$97.87M

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

QMCO:

-$51.03M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMCO vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMCO
QMCO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
QMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMCO vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Corporation (QMCO) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMCOABBVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

0.79

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

1.25

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

1.13

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

2.54

-2.40

QMCO vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMCO and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMCOABBVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

0.79

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.80

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

0.68

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.73

-0.91

Drawdowns

QMCO vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMCO drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMCO and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMCOABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-45.09%

-54.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.72%

-17.32%

-50.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.90%

-20.74%

-73.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.41%

-21.92%

-76.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.67%

-45.09%

-53.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.63%

-9.77%

-89.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.08%

-10.73%

-77.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.44%

7.67%

+32.77%

Volatility

QMCO vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Quantum Corporation (QMCO) has a higher volatility of 36.66% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 5.42%. This indicates that QMCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMCOABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.66%

5.42%

+31.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.36%

17.63%

+49.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.36%

23.95%

+76.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

158.72%

22.84%

+135.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.58%

25.74%

+98.84%

Dividends

QMCO vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

QMCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.13%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
QMCO
Quantum Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QMCO vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Corporation and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
74.59M
15.00B
(QMCO) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QMCO vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quantum Corporation and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
38.8%
83.5%
Portfolio components
QMCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quantum Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.93M and revenue of 74.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

QMCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quantum Corporation reported an operating income of -1.19M and revenue of 74.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

QMCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quantum Corporation reported a net income of -27.84M and revenue of 74.59M, resulting in a net margin of -37.3%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QMCO and ABBV have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMCO has higher volatility (36.66%) compared to ABBV (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMCO dropped -99.93% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMCO and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer