QMAG vs. NFTY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QMAG (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMAG is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. QMAG is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, QMAG returned 15.09% vs -6.58% for NFTY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMAG charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.

Performance

QMAG vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August (QMAG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMAG achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -7.30% return.

QMAG

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 5.94%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFTY

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: -7.30%
• 6M: -7.62%
• 1Y: -6.58%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMAG vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMAG FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August	6.31%	13.16%	4.71%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	-7.30%	5.47%	-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QMAG and NFTY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024	0.36

Return for Risk

QMAG vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMAG

QMAG Risk / Return Rank: 73
QMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

NFTY

NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 5
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMAG vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August (QMAG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMAG	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	-0.45	+2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	-0.58	+3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.94	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	-0.41	+3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	-1.01	+14.62

QMAG vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMAG and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMAG vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMAG drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAG and NFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMAG	NFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-47.67%	+35.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.23%	-16.14%	+10.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-15.26%	+14.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-9.60%	+8.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	6.56%	-5.45%

Volatility

QMAG vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August (QMAG) is 1.58%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that QMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMAG	NFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	4.23%	-2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.63%	12.75%	-7.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.20%	14.75%	-7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	17.41%	-6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.79%	20.72%	-9.93%

QMAG vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMAG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMAG vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

QMAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	1.91%	1.24%	1.61%	0.13%	5.89%	1.53%	0.61%	0.97%	0.00%	4.10%	3.28%	4.39%
QMAG FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMAG and NFTY in my portfolio?

QMAG and NFTY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMAG or NFTY?

NFTY has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to QMAG (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMAG dropped -12.44% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

Which ETF is better, QMAG or NFTY?

On 1-year performance, QMAG leads with 15.09% vs -6.58% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, QMAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMAG or NFTY?

Over the 1-year period, QMAG has performed better with a 15.09% return vs -6.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMAG or NFTY?

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMAG or NFTY?

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for QMAG.

What is the main difference between QMAG and NFTY?

QMAG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMAG and 0.80% for NFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.