PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

QLTY.AX (BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF) and A200.AX (Betashares Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLTY.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the BetaShares Global Quality Leaders Index, while A200.AX is a fund fund tracking the Solactive Australia 200 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLTY.AX returned 9.16%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for A200.AX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (QLTY.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY.AX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than A200.AX's 2.54% return.

QLTY.AX

1D
-0.88%
1M
-0.19%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
—

A200.AX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.63%
6M
2.18%
YTD
2.54%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QLTY.AX
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF		1.90%7.63%25.10%29.03%-20.89%29.83%13.51%35.38%-5.34%
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF		2.54%10.31%9.74%10.96%-1.18%17.90%1.16%22.87%-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY.AX and A200.AX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018

0.56

The correlation between QLTY.AX and A200.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF

Betashares Australia 200 ETF

Often compared with A200.AX:
A200.AX vs. IVVA200.AX vs. DHHF.AXA200.AX vs. VOOA200.AX vs. IOOA200.AX vs. BHPA200.AX vs. VASGXA200.AX vs. VASVX

Return for Risk

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QLTY.AX
QLTY.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QLTY.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLTY.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLTY.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QLTY.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLTY.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
A200.AX
A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (QLTY.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QLTY.AXA200.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.59
0.49

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.89
0.79

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.70

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

1.65

-0.26

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the A200.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY.AX and A200.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY.AX drawdown since its inception was -27.94%, smaller than the maximum A200.AX drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY.AX and A200.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QLTY.AXA200.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.94%

-35.55%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-8.40%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-13.22%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-14.79%

-13.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-2.62%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-4.25%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

3.62%

+1.52%

Volatility

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (QLTY.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) at 2.37%. This indicates that QLTY.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than A200.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QLTY.AXA200.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.37%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

9.74%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

11.99%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

12.62%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

15.17%

-0.23%

Dividends

QLTY.AX vs. A200.AX - Dividend Comparison

QLTY.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than A200.AX's 2.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF		2.51%3.33%1.57%2.89%5.68%2.98%2.54%3.61%1.40%
QLTY.AX
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF		3.15%2.30%2.86%0.66%0.80%4.34%2.31%1.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

QLTY.AX and A200.AX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLTY.AX tracks BetaShares Global Quality Leaders Index, while A200.AX tracks Solactive Australia 200 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLTY.AX and A200.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer