PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLTA vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLTA vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTA achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


QLTA

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.04%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
2.00%

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTA vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QLTA
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
0.31%7.36%3.25%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QLTA and USOY is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.27

The correlation between QLTA and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (1 year) to -0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLTA vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTA
QLTA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QLTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QLTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLTA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTA vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLTAUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

4.03

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

7.74

-1.95

QLTA vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTA and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLTAUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.89

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.99

-0.59

Drawdowns

QLTA vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTA drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTA and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLTAUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-17.46%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-14.29%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-5.11%

+1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-6.47%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

7.42%

-6.48%

Volatility

QLTA vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) is 1.37%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that QLTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLTAUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

11.62%

-10.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

27.18%

-23.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

30.44%

-26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.22%

26.13%

-18.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.02%

26.13%

-19.11%

QLTA vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLTA vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

QLTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLTA
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
4.47%4.33%4.11%3.39%2.79%1.96%2.31%2.99%3.09%2.67%2.59%2.99%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLTA and USOY have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to QLTA (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLTA dropped -22.27% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 5.42% for QLTA. On fees, QLTA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QLTA has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLTA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 4.47% for QLTA.

QLTA is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QLTA and 1.22% for USOY.

USOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLTA and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer