QLTA vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLTA (iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. QLTA is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. QLTA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

QLTA vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QLTA

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.04%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: 2.00%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTA vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QLTA iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF	-0.20%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

QLTA vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTA

QLTA Risk / Return Rank: 35
QLTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QLTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
QLTA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QLTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
QLTA Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTA vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLTA	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.80	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLTA	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	—	—

Drawdowns

QLTA vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTA drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTA and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLTA	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.27%	0.00%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	0.00%	-3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	0.00%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLTA	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.37%	0.00%	+4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.22%	0.00%	+7.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.02%	0.00%	+7.02%

QLTA vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLTA vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

QLTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLTA iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF	4.47%	4.33%	4.11%	3.39%	2.79%	1.96%	2.31%	2.99%	3.09%	2.67%	2.59%	2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QLTA or QCON?

On fees, QLTA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLTA or QCON?

QLTA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLTA or QCON?

QLTA has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between QLTA and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QLTA and 0.32% for QCON.