PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFRX vs. QMFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 (QMFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than QMFRX's 11.42% return.


QLFRX

1D
2.19%
1M
6.59%
YTD
0.83%
6M
4.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QMFRX

1D
1.35%
1M
8.31%
YTD
11.42%
6M
13.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.83%6.80%
QMFRX
AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6
11.42%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFRX and QMFRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 (QMFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFRXQMFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

2.16

-1.22

Drawdowns

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than QMFRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and QMFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFRXQMFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-10.27%

-4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-2.28%

-3.43%

Volatility

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFRXQMFRXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

14.36%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

14.36%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

14.36%

+1.58%

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QMFRX's 3.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFRX vs. QMFRX - Dividend Comparison

QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than QMFRX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.22%0.22%
QMFRX
AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6
0.43%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLFRX and QMFRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFRX and QMFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer