PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFRX vs. QHFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than QHFIX's 3.97% return.


QLFRX

1D
2.19%
1M
6.59%
YTD
0.83%
6M
4.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QHFIX

1D
2.59%
1M
9.72%
YTD
3.97%
6M
7.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.83%6.80%
QHFIX
AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I
3.97%4.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFRX and QHFIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFRXQHFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.04

-0.10

Drawdowns

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, roughly equal to the maximum QHFIX drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and QHFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFRXQHFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-13.85%

-0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-5.07%

-0.64%

Volatility

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFRXQHFIXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

16.47%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.47%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.47%

-0.53%

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFIX's 6.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFRX vs. QHFIX - Dividend Comparison

QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while QHFIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
QHFIX
AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.22%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLFRX and QHFIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFRX and QHFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer