PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLC vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLC vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLC vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 8.17% return.


QLC

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
0.78%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
13.29%

FMTM

1D
4.80%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
8.17%
6M
16.49%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLC vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLC vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC
QLC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLCFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.58

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.09

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.15

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.71

11.97

-2.25

QLC vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLCFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.58

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.61

-0.89

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and FMTM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QLC vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
1.01%0.94%1.03%1.26%1.46%0.96%1.40%1.91%1.82%1.29%1.80%0.64%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QLC vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLCFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.86%

-12.12%

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-12.12%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.22%

-7.90%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-1.88%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.19%

-0.67%

Volatility

QLC vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) is 5.11%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that QLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLCFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

11.09%

-5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

19.22%

-9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

23.34%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

23.18%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

23.18%

-4.79%