QLC vs. FMTM
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM).
QLC and FMTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLC is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2015.
Performance
QLC vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLC vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | -3.32% | 26.81% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 8.17% | 27.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 8.17% return.
QLC
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
FMTM
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLC vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLC vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
QLC
FMTM
QLC vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.58 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 2.09 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.15 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 11.97 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.58 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.61 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLC and FMTM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QLC vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 1.01% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QLC vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and FMTM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.86% | -12.12% | -23.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -12.12% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -7.90% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -1.88% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.19% | -0.67% |
Volatility
QLC vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) is 5.11%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that QLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 11.09% | -5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 19.22% | -9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 23.34% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 23.18% | -6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 23.18% | -4.79% |