PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QKACX vs. GQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QKACX achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly higher than GQEIX's 2.94% return.


QKACX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
5.67%
6M
5.57%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.18%

GQEIX

1D
0.39%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.07%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
5.67%21.16%31.05%23.55%-14.17%31.45%22.00%26.88%-15.04%
GQEIX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund
2.94%-4.31%29.20%17.77%-2.69%19.88%23.88%27.34%-7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QKACX and GQEIX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.67

The correlation between QKACX and GQEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QKACX vs. GQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QKACX
QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GQEIX
GQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QKACXGQEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.04

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

0.27

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

0.70

+10.30

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QKACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the GQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QKACX and GQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QKACX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than GQEIX's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QKACX and GQEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QKACXGQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.51%

-28.48%

-32.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-8.45%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-18.92%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-20.44%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-11.97%

+9.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-5.77%

-5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.27%

-1.33%

Volatility

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX) at 3.66%. This indicates that QKACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QKACXGQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.66%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

8.00%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

10.50%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

15.91%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

18.72%

+0.01%

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QKACX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than GQEIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QKACX vs. GQEIX - Dividend Comparison

QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than GQEIX's 7.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQEIX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund
7.16%7.38%5.41%0.63%4.50%1.50%0.67%0.65%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
4.47%4.72%8.90%1.45%11.20%17.85%3.09%3.41%8.83%0.74%0.00%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QKACX and GQEIX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QKACX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GQEIX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QKACX dropped -60.51% vs GQEIX's -28.48%.

QKACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QKACX and GQEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer