PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QKACX vs. FTZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QKACX achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than FTZIX's 21.01% return.


QKACX

1D
1.00%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
5.92%
6M
5.82%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
16.88%

FTZIX

1D
1.20%
1M
7.47%
YTD
21.01%
6M
18.71%
1Y
46.67%
3Y*
27.37%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
5.92%21.16%31.05%23.55%-14.17%31.45%22.00%26.88%0.86%
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
21.01%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%25.25%19.60%33.70%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QKACX and FTZIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between QKACX and FTZIX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QKACX vs. FTZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QKACX
QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QKACXFTZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

5.16

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

19.94

-8.95

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QKACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FTZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QKACX and FTZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QKACX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than FTZIX's maximum drawdown of -37.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QKACX and FTZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QKACXFTZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.51%

-37.22%

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-9.03%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-18.65%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-29.53%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-0.50%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-6.47%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.33%

-0.39%

Volatility

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) is 4.51%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that QKACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QKACXFTZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

5.25%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

13.36%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

16.72%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

19.52%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

22.33%

-3.61%

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QKACX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FTZIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

QKACX vs. FTZIX - Dividend Comparison

QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than FTZIX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
4.46%4.72%8.90%1.45%11.20%17.85%3.09%3.41%8.83%0.74%0.00%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QKACX and FTZIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTZIX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to QKACX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QKACX dropped -60.51% vs FTZIX's -37.22%.

FTZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QKACX and FTZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer