QJUN vs. DBO
QJUN (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QJUN is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. QJUN is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QJUN returned 15.46%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for DBO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
QJUN vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QJUN achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
QJUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
QJUN vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June | 5.97% | 13.59% | 16.36% | 36.34% | -17.34% | 7.08% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 6.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QJUN and DBO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between QJUN and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QJUN vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QJUN
DBO
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QJUN
DBO
-
Communication Services
QJUN
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
QJUN
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
QJUN
DBO
-
Healthcare
QJUN
DBO
-
Industrials
QJUN
DBO
-
Utilities
QJUN
DBO
-
Basic Materials
QJUN
DBO
-
Energy
QJUN
DBO
-
Financial Services
QJUN
DBO
Real Estate
QJUN
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QJUN vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
QJUN
DBO
QJUN vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QJUN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.28 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 8.69 | +8.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QJUN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.25 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.02 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
QJUN vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QJUN drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QJUN and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QJUN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -90.18% | +70.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -18.19% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.47% | -28.20% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.68% | +52.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -62.25% | +58.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 8.94% | -7.99% |
Volatility
QJUN vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) is 0.31%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that QJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QJUN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.31% | 12.79% | -12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.67% | 28.32% | -22.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.99% | 34.58% | -26.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 32.31% | -18.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 31.79% | -17.61% |
QJUN vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
QJUN vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
QJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QJUN and DBO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to QJUN (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QJUN dropped -19.92% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 20.83% vs 15.46% for QJUN. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, QJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 20.83% return vs 15.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QJUN.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for QJUN.
QJUN is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QJUN and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QJUN and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer