PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QISCX vs. WWSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QISCX achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly lower than WWSIX's 26.69% return. Over the past 10 years, QISCX has underperformed WWSIX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while WWSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


QISCX

1D
0.55%
1M
3.49%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.74%
1Y
41.00%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
12.40%

WWSIX

1D
1.16%
1M
4.17%
YTD
26.69%
6M
27.09%
1Y
60.23%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QISCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund
15.16%14.95%14.82%20.58%-23.14%30.60%17.00%18.06%-11.63%15.67%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
26.69%17.55%15.79%12.87%-12.30%30.04%11.27%28.74%-13.49%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QISCX and WWSIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2008

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between QISCX and WWSIX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QISCX vs. WWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QISCX
QISCX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

WWSIX
WWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
WWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QISCXWWSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.53

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

6.30

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

22.98

-13.51

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QISCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the WWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QISCX and WWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QISCXWWSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.10

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.55

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.62

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.44

-0.09

Drawdowns

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QISCX drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than WWSIX's maximum drawdown of -59.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QISCX and WWSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QISCXWWSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-59.71%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-10.17%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.51%

-26.17%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-26.17%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

-45.11%

-3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.34%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-8.96%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.78%

+1.56%

Volatility

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX) and Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional (WWSIX) have volatilities of 5.08% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QISCXWWSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

5.21%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

13.81%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

20.70%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.24%

21.65%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.17%

23.72%

+0.45%

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QISCX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WWSIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

QISCX vs. WWSIX - Dividend Comparison

QISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than WWSIX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QISCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund
6.92%7.97%0.35%0.31%3.77%15.41%0.44%0.36%3.81%4.49%0.85%12.05%
WWSIX
Keeley Small Cap Fund Class Institutional
6.09%7.72%28.12%3.00%1.85%5.58%0.20%4.70%14.34%8.83%9.05%18.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


QISCX and WWSIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WWSIX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to QISCX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QISCX dropped -68.05% vs WWSIX's -59.71%.

WWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QISCX and WWSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer