QILGX vs. FULBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX).
QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005. FULBX is managed by Federated. It was launched on May 30, 1997.
Performance
QILGX vs. FULBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QILGX vs. FULBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.18% | 19.46% | 40.83% | 39.63% | -24.86% | 30.46% | 38.39% | 32.01% | 1.52% | 25.42% |
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund | 0.30% | 5.50% | 5.35% | 5.15% | -1.31% | 0.02% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.24% | 1.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QILGX achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly lower than FULBX's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, QILGX has outperformed FULBX with an annualized return of 17.94%, while FULBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.
QILGX
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
FULBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QILGX vs. FULBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QILGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FULBX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QILGX vs. FULBX — Risk / Return Rank
QILGX
FULBX
QILGX vs. FULBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QILGX | FULBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 2.77 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 7.32 | -5.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 2.46 | -1.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 9.04 | -7.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 32.74 | -28.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QILGX | FULBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.77 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 2.21 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 1.94 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.08 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between QILGX and FULBX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
QILGX vs. FULBX - Dividend Comparison
QILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than FULBX's 4.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.41% | 3.09% | 6.60% | 1.47% | 13.57% | 19.44% | 7.47% | 5.07% | 10.33% | 7.40% | 0.55% | 11.76% |
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund | 4.32% | 4.79% | 3.99% | 2.67% | 1.00% | 0.56% | 1.49% | 2.16% | 1.90% | 1.25% | 0.84% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
QILGX vs. FULBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QILGX drawdown since its inception was -53.48%, which is greater than FULBX's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QILGX and FULBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QILGX | FULBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.48% | -5.43% | -48.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.55% | -0.54% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.05% | -2.60% | -27.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | -4.67% | -27.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.44% | -0.43% | -12.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -0.81% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 0.15% | +4.60% |
Volatility
QILGX vs. FULBX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) at 0.28%. This indicates that QILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FULBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QILGX | FULBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 0.28% | +6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 1.16% | +12.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.96% | 1.64% | +18.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 1.34% | +19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 1.24% | +19.98% |