QILGX vs. BBLIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX).

QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005. BBLIX is managed by BBH. It was launched on Sep 9, 2019.

Performance

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	-12.41%	19.46%	40.83%	39.63%	-24.86%	30.46%	38.39%	6.40%
BBLIX BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund	1.58%	12.07%	15.83%	23.86%	-20.59%	27.23%	12.30%	3.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QILGX achieves a -12.41% return, which is significantly lower than BBLIX's 1.58% return.

QILGX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -8.08%
• YTD: -12.41%
• 6M: -9.86%
• 1Y: 13.84%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 14.85%
• 10Y*: 17.51%

BBLIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 13.25%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QILGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.

QILGX

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund

BBLIX

BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund

Return for Risk

QILGX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QILGX

QILGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
QILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
QILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
QILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
QILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BBLIX

BBLIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
BBLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BBLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BBLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BBLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BBLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QILGX	BBLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	1.10	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	1.69	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.29	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	0.94	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	3.81	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QILGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the BBLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QILGX and BBLIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QILGX	BBLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55	1.10	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.65	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.58	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between QILGX and BBLIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison

QILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than BBLIX's 9.39% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	3.53%	3.09%	6.60%	1.47%	13.57%	19.44%	7.47%	5.07%	10.33%	7.40%	0.55%	11.76%
BBLIX BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund	9.39%	9.54%	4.20%	0.28%	1.45%	3.27%	0.34%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QILGX drawdown since its inception was -53.48%, which is greater than BBLIX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QILGX and BBLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QILGX	BBLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.48%	-33.49%	-19.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.55%	-10.22%	-5.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.05%	-28.06%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.55%	-1.80%	-13.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.01%	-6.48%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.69%	3.62%	+1.07%

Volatility

QILGX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) at 1.57%. This indicates that QILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QILGX	BBLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	1.57%	+3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	6.08%	+6.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.67%	16.12%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.98%	16.08%	+4.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.19%	18.80%	+2.39%