PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIG vs. BBCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIG vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.


QIG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
2.50%

BBCB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.82%
6M
2.66%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIG vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
0.49%7.85%2.28%8.48%-16.25%-1.52%9.75%13.97%0.26%
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
2.82%7.69%1.97%8.42%-15.72%-2.23%10.39%14.86%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QIG and BBCB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018

0.95

The correlation between QIG and BBCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIG vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIG
QIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BBCB
BBCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIG vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIGBBCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.85

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

10.09

-3.18

QIG vs. BBCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BBCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIG and BBCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIGBBCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.12

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.46

-0.13

Drawdowns

QIG vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIG and BBCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIGBBCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-22.48%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-2.95%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-6.46%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-22.32%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.34%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-6.66%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.83%

+0.03%

Volatility

QIG vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) have volatilities of 1.35% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIGBBCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.41%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

3.98%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

4.93%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

7.25%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

7.50%

+0.04%

QIG vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QIG vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison

QIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
7.15%5.02%5.22%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.59%5.25%0.20%0.00%0.00%
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
4.88%4.82%4.67%4.19%4.25%2.50%2.61%3.00%3.27%2.88%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QIG and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBCB has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to QIG (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIG dropped -22.92% vs BBCB's -22.48%.

On 5-year performance, BBCB leads with 0.84% vs 0.56% for QIG. On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBCB has performed better with a 0.84% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QIG.

BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.88% for QIG.

QIG tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QIG and 0.09% for BBCB.

BBCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIG and BBCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer