QIACX vs. FGJEX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX).

QIACX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. FGJEX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

QIACX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QIACX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	-4.89%	25.41%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	-0.45%	24.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIACX achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than FGJEX's -0.45% return.

QIACX

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -4.69%
• YTD: -4.89%
• 6M: -1.60%
• 1Y: 18.54%
• 3Y*: 20.52%
• 5Y*: 14.45%
• 10Y*: 15.59%

FGJEX

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIACX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIACX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.

QIACX

Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund

FGJEX

Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

QIACX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIACX

QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 64
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIACX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QIACX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QIACX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	2.34	-1.79

Correlation

The correlation between QIACX and FGJEX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QIACX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison

QIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than FGJEX's 9.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	4.81%	4.58%	8.65%	1.40%	10.90%	17.44%	3.01%	3.34%	8.60%	0.69%	1.12%	1.25%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	9.63%	9.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QIACX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIACX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIACX and FGJEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIACX	FGJEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.11%	-8.32%	-51.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.88%	-5.93%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.36%	-1.07%	-8.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QIACX	FGJEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	11.08%	+5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	11.08%	+6.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	11.08%	+7.64%