QHFRX vs. QHFIX
QHFRX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6) and QHFIX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I) are both Multistrategy funds from AQR. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QHFRX charges 6.59%/yr vs 6.69%/yr for QHFIX.
Performance
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with QHFRX at 3.72% and QHFIX at 3.72%.
QHFRX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHFRX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 | 3.72% | 5.06% |
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 3.72% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHFRX and QHFIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 (QHFRX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHFRX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 1.00 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHFRX drawdown since its inception was -13.76%, roughly equal to the maximum QHFIX drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFRX and QHFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHFRX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.76% | -13.85% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.24% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.04% | +0.06% |
Volatility
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHFRX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 16.42% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 16.42% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 16.42% | -0.02% |
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHFRX has a 6.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFIX's 6.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHFRX vs. QHFIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QHFRX nor QHFIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QHFRX and QHFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QHFRX and QHFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer