QHFNX vs. QHFRX
QHFNX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N) and QHFRX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6) are both Multistrategy funds from AQR. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QHFNX charges 6.94%/yr vs 6.59%/yr for QHFRX.
Performance
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHFNX achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than QHFRX's 3.38% return.
QHFNX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFRX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N | 3.21% | 4.97% |
QHFRX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 | 3.38% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHFNX and QHFRX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 (QHFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHFNX | QHFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHFNX drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, roughly equal to the maximum QHFRX drawdown of -13.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFNX and QHFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHFNX | QHFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -13.76% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.57% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -4.92% | -0.06% |
Volatility
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHFNX | QHFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 16.29% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 16.29% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 16.29% | -0.10% |
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHFNX has a 6.94% expense ratio, which is higher than QHFRX's 6.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHFNX vs. QHFRX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QHFNX nor QHFRX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QHFNX and QHFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QHFNX and QHFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer