PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QHFIX vs. QHFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QHFIX having a 3.55% return and QHFNX slightly lower at 3.38%.


QHFIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.79%
YTD
3.55%
6M
6.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QHFNX

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.82%
YTD
3.38%
6M
6.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QHFIX and QHFNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QHFIXQHFNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.97

+0.01

Drawdowns

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QHFIX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, roughly equal to the maximum QHFNX drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFIX and QHFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QHFIXQHFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-13.87%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.41%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-5.01%

0.00%

Volatility

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QHFIXQHFNXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

16.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

16.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

16.24%

+0.13%

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QHFIX has a 6.69% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFNX's 6.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

QHFIX vs. QHFNX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QHFIX nor QHFNX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QHFIX and QHFNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QHFIX and QHFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer