QGMIX vs. DNAVX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX).
QGMIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Apr 7, 2014. DNAVX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Apr 28, 2010.
Performance
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGMIX AQR Macro Opportunities Fund | 1.84% | 4.00% | -0.95% | 0.01% | 29.30% | -4.54% | 1.60% | 4.90% | 7.80% | -3.38% |
DNAVX Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund | 3.37% | 5.12% | 6.13% | 18.70% | -14.02% | 9.29% | 1.63% | 13.99% | -8.44% | 8.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGMIX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than DNAVX's 3.37% return. Over the past 10 years, QGMIX has underperformed DNAVX with an annualized return of 3.63%, while DNAVX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.05% annualized return.
QGMIX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- -1.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.63%
DNAVX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGMIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DNAVX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QGMIX vs. DNAVX — Risk / Return Rank
QGMIX
DNAVX
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | 1.79 | -1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | 2.64 | -2.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.37 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 3.72 | -3.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 15.30 | -15.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 1.79 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.34 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between QGMIX and DNAVX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Dividend Comparison
QGMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than DNAVX's 11.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGMIX AQR Macro Opportunities Fund | 1.41% | 1.44% | 1.92% | 10.07% | 7.48% | 1.49% | 0.96% | 0.05% | 3.92% | 0.04% | 6.05% | 5.30% |
DNAVX Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund | 11.18% | 11.56% | 0.00% | 3.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGMIX drawdown since its inception was -13.48%, smaller than the maximum DNAVX drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGMIX and DNAVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -17.73% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.77% | -2.13% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.48% | -17.12% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.48% | -17.73% | +4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -0.68% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.91% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 0.52% | +2.96% |
Volatility
QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) have volatilities of 2.05% and 2.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QGMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 2.13% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.36% | 3.26% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.82% | 4.40% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.98% | 8.67% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.37% | 8.46% | -0.09% |