QGMIX vs. DNAVX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

QGMIX (AQR Macro Opportunities Fund) and DNAVX (Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund) are both Macro Trading funds. Over the past 10 years, QGMIX returned 3.61%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for DNAVX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QGMIX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for DNAVX.

Performance

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGMIX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than DNAVX's 0.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QGMIX having a 3.61% annualized return and DNAVX not far behind at 3.49%.

QGMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.62%
• 6M: -3.00%
• YTD: -0.82%
• 1Y: -1.00%
• 3Y*: 1.93%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 3.61%

DNAVX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: -0.26%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 1Y: 2.10%
• 3Y*: 6.11%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QGMIX AQR Macro Opportunities Fund	-0.82%	4.00%	-0.95%	0.01%	29.30%	-4.54%	1.60%	4.90%	7.80%	-3.38%
DNAVX Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund	0.71%	5.12%	6.13%	18.70%	-14.02%	9.29%	1.63%	13.99%	-8.44%	8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between QGMIX and DNAVX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.03

Over the past year, QGMIX and DNAVX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

QGMIX vs. DNAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGMIX

QGMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
QGMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
QGMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
QGMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
QGMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
QGMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

DNAVX

DNAVX Risk / Return Rank: 8
DNAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
DNAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
DNAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
DNAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DNAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QGMIX	DNAVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	0.45	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.65	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.08	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	0.51	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	1.70	-2.16

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGMIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the DNAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGMIX and DNAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGMIX drawdown since its inception was -13.48%, smaller than the maximum DNAVX drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGMIX and DNAVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGMIX	DNAVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.48%	-17.73%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.28%	-3.83%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.48%	-8.05%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.48%	-17.12%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.48%	-17.73%	+4.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.43%	-3.41%	-2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-3.87%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.14%	+1.26%

Volatility

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) is 1.38%, while Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that QGMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGMIX	DNAVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	1.48%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.08%	3.83%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.79%	4.32%	+1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	8.63%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.37%	8.40%	-0.03%

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGMIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DNAVX's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

QGMIX vs. DNAVX - Dividend Comparison

QGMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DNAVX's 11.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNAVX Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund	11.48%	11.56%	0.00%	3.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.75%	0.00%	2.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGMIX AQR Macro Opportunities Fund	1.45%	1.44%	1.92%	10.07%	7.48%	1.49%	0.96%	0.05%	3.92%	0.04%	6.05%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QGMIX and DNAVX in my portfolio?

QGMIX and DNAVX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QGMIX or DNAVX?

DNAVX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to QGMIX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGMIX dropped -13.48% vs DNAVX's -17.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.