PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGEN vs. LZAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Qiagen N.V. (QGEN) and Lonza Group AG (LZAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGEN achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly lower than LZAGY's 8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, QGEN has underperformed LZAGY with an annualized return of 6.62%, while LZAGY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.


QGEN

1D
-1.14%
1M
11.93%
6M
-13.26%
YTD
-7.02%
1Y
-13.12%
3Y*
-2.41%
5Y*
-3.63%
10Y*
6.62%

LZAGY

1D
0.55%
1M
18.04%
6M
5.27%
YTD
8.65%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
17.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QGEN
Qiagen N.V.
-7.02%1.51%2.44%-12.91%-10.27%5.17%56.36%-1.89%11.38%10.49%
LZAGY
Lonza Group AG
8.65%14.70%40.20%-13.41%-41.45%30.64%76.57%41.02%-2.71%69.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QGEN and LZAGY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008

0.37

The correlation between QGEN and LZAGY shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QGEN:

$8.56B

LZAGY:

$51.68B

Total Revenue (TTM)

QGEN:

$2.10B

LZAGY:

CHF 12.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QGEN:

$1.29B

LZAGY:

CHF 4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

QGEN:

$714.95M

LZAGY:

CHF 2.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Qiagen N.V.

Lonza Group AG

Often compared with QGEN:
QGEN vs. DLBQGEN vs. SPY
Often compared with LZAGY:
LZAGY vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

QGEN vs. LZAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGEN
QGEN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
QGEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QGEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGEN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

LZAGY
LZAGY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LZAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LZAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qiagen N.V. (QGEN) and Lonza Group AG (LZAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QGENLZAGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.04

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

0.13

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

0.26

-0.94

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the LZAGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGEN and LZAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGEN drawdown since its inception was -92.14%, which is greater than LZAGY's maximum drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGEN and LZAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGENLZAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.14%

-67.74%

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.38%

-20.23%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.38%

-46.35%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.43%

-59.39%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-59.39%

+16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.75%

-13.38%

-13.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.33%

-18.64%

-28.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.33%

9.96%

+10.37%

Volatility

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Volatility Comparison

Qiagen N.V. (QGEN) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Lonza Group AG (LZAGY) at 6.38%. This indicates that QGEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGENLZAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

6.38%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.28%

19.16%

+10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.66%

24.81%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.99%

31.79%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.21%

29.72%

-2.51%

Dividends

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Dividend Comparison

QGEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than LZAGY's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZAGY
Lonza Group AG
0.44%0.35%0.38%0.45%0.32%0.20%0.13%0.67%1.01%6.06%
QGEN
Qiagen N.V.
6.36%0.56%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.36%

Financials

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qiagen N.V. and Lonza Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
492.32M
2.66B
(QGEN) Total Revenue
(LZAGY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. QGEN values in USD, LZAGY values in CHF

QGEN vs. LZAGY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Qiagen N.V. and Lonza Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
62.5%
36.2%
Portfolio components
QGEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Qiagen N.V. reported a gross profit of 307.87M and revenue of 492.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

LZAGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lonza Group AG reported a gross profit of 961.99M and revenue of 2.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.2%.

QGEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Qiagen N.V. reported an operating income of 117.22M and revenue of 492.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

LZAGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lonza Group AG reported an operating income of 693.32M and revenue of 2.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

QGEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Qiagen N.V. reported a net income of 68.04M and revenue of 492.32M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.

LZAGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lonza Group AG reported a net income of 479.01M and revenue of 2.66B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QGEN and LZAGY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGEN has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to LZAGY (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGEN dropped -92.14% vs LZAGY's -67.74%.

LZAGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGEN and LZAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer