LZAGY vs. QQQ
LZAGY (Lonza Group AG) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, LZAGY returned 14.81%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LZAGY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZAGY achieves a -7.76% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, LZAGY has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.81%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
LZAGY
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -10.62%
- 1Y
- -9.51%
- 3Y*
- -1.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
LZAGY vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZAGY Lonza Group AG | -7.76% | 14.70% | 40.20% | -13.41% | -41.45% | 30.64% | 76.57% | 41.02% | -2.71% | 69.15% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZAGY and QQQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2008 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZAGY vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
LZAGY
QQQ
LZAGY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lonza Group AG (LZAGY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZAGY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.45 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 3.51 | -3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 13.49 | -14.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZAGY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 2.64 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.81 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.99 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
LZAGY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZAGY drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZAGY and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZAGY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -82.97% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.23% | -11.96% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.40% | -22.77% | -24.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.39% | -35.12% | -24.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.39% | -35.12% | -24.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.47% | -0.26% | -26.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.63% | -32.79% | +14.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.23% | 3.11% | +6.12% |
Volatility
LZAGY vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Lonza Group AG (LZAGY) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that LZAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZAGY | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 4.49% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.26% | 12.10% | +6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 15.94% | +8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 22.38% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.81% | 22.29% | +7.52% |
Dividends
LZAGY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
LZAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZAGY Lonza Group AG | 0.52% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.67% | 1.01% | 6.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZAGY and QQQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZAGY has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZAGY dropped -67.74% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZAGY and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer